Nistendirk v. United States
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, Chief Judge.
This is an action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Defendant United States sought leave to implead third party defendant M.F.A. Mutual (hereinafter referred to as M.F.A.) and leave was granted. M.F.A. now moves to vacate the order granting leave to the United States to implead M.F.A. or in the alternative moves to dismiss the third party complaint.
M.F.A. has two main grounds which it advances in support of its position. As set out in its suggestions, those two grounds are that M.F.A. is deprived of a jury trial in violation of the Seventh Amendment of the United…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Irvin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1957
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robert Colton v. John B. Swain, and Third-Party v. Pacific Indemnity Co., a Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. James S. Myers, Individually and for His Wife, Harriet Myers, and as Natural Guardian and Next Friend of James Myers, a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Government Employees Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965
- Abrams v. SinonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.