Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Stein

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 17, 2005No. SC04-1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

916 So.2d 774 (2005)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Rita STEIN, Respondent.

No. SC04-1918.

Supreme Court of Florida.

November 17, 2005.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, and Eric Montel Turner, Bar Counsel, The Florida Bar, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Complainant.

Charles Wender, Boca Raton, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Rita Stein. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The referee found respondent guilty of eight violations of the Rules Regulating…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. PahulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. The Florida Bar v. LawlessSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. The Florida Bar v. BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  4. The Florida Bar v. SweeneySupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  5. The Florida Bar v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Thomas Fortune FayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Florida Bar v. AdornoSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  3. Hart v. Zimmerman Holdings Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API