Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1917No. 8 Div. 468PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Morgan County; Thomas W. Wert, Judge. E. M. Brown was convicted of selling liq-nor in violation of law, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The defendant in this case was convicted of selling liqnor in violation of law, and from the judgment of conviction he appeals.

On the trial of the case the defendant filed a motion to strike the indictment, motion to quash, and pleas in abatement, all of which attack the organization of the court and the validity of the indictment. These questions have been passed upon by this court adversely to the defendant’s contention. Ex parte Brown, 15 Ala. App. 210, 72 South. 772; White v. State, 15 Ala. App. 197, 72 South. 771; Ogles v. State, 15 Ala. App. 111, 72 South. 598; Dock McDaniel v. State,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Ex Parte BrownAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Ogles v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. White v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. York v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Bell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Ex Parte BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API