Legal Opinion

White v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Morgan Law and Equity Court. Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Wert. Yandy White was convicted of uttering a forged instrument, and he appeals. The motions and objections noted went to the formation of the grand jury returning the indictment, and fully appear in the cases cited.

1Opinion of the CourtPelham, P. J.

The recent cases of Jim Ogles v. State, infra, 72 South. 598, and Ex parte E. M. Brown, infra, 72 South. 772, in which opinions were rendered on August 1, 1916, (special August term, 1916), in effect dispose of the questions presented ' on this appeal adversely to the appellant’s contention.(1) The motions made by the defendant seeking to reach the defect were not the proper practice, and do not present the question. — Acts 1909, p. 315, § 23; Thornton v. State, 4 Ala. App. 205, 59 South. 234; Swain v. State, 8 Ala. App. 28, 62 South. 446; Rector v. State, 11 Ala. App. 340, 66 South. 857.

(2,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashford v. McKeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Rector v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Whatley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Town of Athens v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Spivey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. McDaniel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Byars v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. McDaniel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API