Legal Opinion

Ogles v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Morgan Law and Equity Court. Heard before Hon. Thomas W. Wert. Jim Ogles was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. The following are the charges refused to defendant; 1 and 2. General affirmative charge. (3) I charge you that the material or beer found in the barrels and box was not one of the liquors or beverages prohibited by law.

1Opinion of the Court

PELHAM, P. J.(1) The defendant’s objection to going to trial at the adjourned term of the court upon the ground that the court at the time the defendant was arraigned for trial was not legally in session was not well taken. The record shows an order of the court made during regular term time, providing for holding the adjourned term at which the defendant is shown to have been tried. This term, in effect, was but a continuation of the regular term. Under section 3 of the act creating the Morgan county law and equity court, the judge thereof is given the same powers as circuit judges. — Local…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Town of Athens v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Woodward v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Hafley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Ex Parte BrownAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Strange v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BrownAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. White v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. McDaniel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Byars v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API