Legal Opinion

State v. Kemp

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 3, 1965No. 39217 & 39613PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Defendant’s appeal from a judgment of conviction for robbery in the first degree and from an order denying a motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence presents the question of whether defendant was denied a fair trial because of procedural and evidentiary deficiencies appearing in the record before us.

The record conclusively shows that Dave Goldberg, a managing partner of a shoe repair and shoeshine establishment known as Dave’s Shoe Repair in Minneapolis, was severely beaten and robbed of about $600 between 7 and 8 p. m. on April 28, 1962.

Mr. Goldberg’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. State v. McLarneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. State v. EdmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API