State v. Kemp
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendant’s appeal from a judgment of conviction for robbery in the first degree and from an order denying a motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence presents the question of whether defendant was denied a fair trial because of procedural and evidentiary deficiencies appearing in the record before us.
The record conclusively shows that Dave Goldberg, a managing partner of a shoe repair and shoeshine establishment known as Dave’s Shoe Repair in Minneapolis, was severely beaten and robbed of about $600 between 7 and 8 p. m. on April 28, 1962.
Mr. Goldberg’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State v. McLarneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. EdmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.