State v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN L. MAXWELL, Justice. *
In this appeal from jury convictions for criminal sexual conduct in the third degree, aggravated assault, ,and aggravated sodomy, defendant, Dennis Michael Hamilton, raises, among other issues, the question which we did not reach in State v. Hill, 309 Minn. 206, 244 N.W.2d 728 (1976): whether defendant’s constitutional right of confrontation was abridged by the trial court’s denial of defendant’s request to cross-examine complainant concerning her prior sexual conduct where the defense is consent. Finding no denial of defendant’s right of confrontation, we affirm…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. ArendaMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. CaswellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. HeinzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.