Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Mustang Fuel Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 4, 1989No. 65361PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
Certain landowners granted the Mustang Fuel Co. an easement for pipeline purposes in exchange for cash payments. Others exchanged the right of way for cash payment and among other things, the right to purchase natural gas cheaply. Where the landowners granted this easement in return for the right to purchase gas, under what circumstances may the company shut off the gas?
The company, which wishes to discontinue providing gas to all such landowners, relies on later contractual agreements which purport to allow the company to discontinue gas service on 30 days notice. Certain of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Slife v. Kundtz Properties, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Amoco Production Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Continental Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baker v. Conoco Pipeline Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
- Cason v. Conoco Pipeline Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
- Stangl v. Mustang Fuel Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Alta Mesa Resources, Inc. and Cimarron Express Pipeline, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2023
- Beattie v. STATE EX REL. GRDASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.