Legal Opinion

Chiuccariello v. Building Commissioner

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 9, 1990No. 89-P-674PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

This is a land use case in which abutters challenge a variance on the ground that they did not receive written notice of the hearing on the variance application as required by the zoning enabling act for Boston.3 A judge of the Superior Court ruled that the plaintiff-abutters failed to appeal the variance in a timely manner and that they were not entitled to relief in the nature of mandamus.4 We conclude: 1) that relief in the nature of mandamus was available; 2) that although there was no evidence of written notice to the abutters there was nonetheless actual knowledge; 3) that the abutters…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. Board of Appeals of WestportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Damaskos v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Myers v. SalinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Bedford v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  5. Kasper v. Board of Appeals of WatertownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Gordon v. State Building Code Appeals BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Reilly v. Local 589, Amalgamated Transit UnionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Kitras v. Zoning AdministratorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Lapidus v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API