Chiuccariello v. Building Commissioner
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
This is a land use case in which abutters challenge a variance on the ground that they did not receive written notice of the hearing on the variance application as required by the zoning enabling act for Boston.3 A judge of the Superior Court ruled that the plaintiff-abutters failed to appeal the variance in a timely manner and that they were not entitled to relief in the nature of mandamus.4 We conclude: 1) that relief in the nature of mandamus was available; 2) that although there was no evidence of written notice to the abutters there was nonetheless actual knowledge; 3) that the abutters…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. Board of Appeals of WestportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Damaskos v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Myers v. SalinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Bedford v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Kasper v. Board of Appeals of WatertownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kramer v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Gordon v. State Building Code Appeals BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Reilly v. Local 589, Amalgamated Transit UnionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Kitras v. Zoning AdministratorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Lapidus v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.