Lapidus v. Board of Appeal
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.
Some twenty-three years after the city of Boston issued a permit for the use of certain premises as a restaurant with entertainment, the plaintiff3 requested that the *724commissioner of the inspectional services department (commissioner) investigate the use and revoke the permit if the premises were not properly zoned for such use. Given “the Legislature’s desire for finality [in the appeals process],” Chiuccariello v. Building Commr. of Boston, 29 Mass. App. Ct. 482, 489 (1990), we conclude, in the facts and circumstances of this case, that the passage of twenty-three years precludes an appeal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. Board of Appeals of WestportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Cape Resort Hotels, Inc. v. Alcoholic Licensing BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Chilson v. Zoning Board of Appeal of AttleboroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Vokes v. Avery W. Lovell, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bruno v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- 311 West Broadway LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Barkan v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of TruroMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019