Legal Opinion

Carlyle v. Pee

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1928No. 27,996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The question presented here involves the interpretation of a will and the validity of certain deeds executed by a beneficiary thereunder. The grantee in the deeds sought to quiet his title, was defeated and appeals. The facts are substantially as follows:

John C. Witt died April 25, 1908, seized of real and personal property. He executed a will, the material portions of which read:

“I, John C. Witt, give, devise and bequeath all my estate, real and personal, to my wife, Alice Witt, as long as she may live, and after her death to go to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pearson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Martin v. BatteySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Pee v. CarlyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Reville v. DubachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Mansfield v. CraneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. GoellertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Smith v. JudgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Carlyle v. PeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Cox v. McBroomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Anderson v. RosebrookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API