Legal Opinion

Cox v. McBroom

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 16, 1942No. 35,424PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to partition real estate. The property involved includes five tracts which originally stood in the name of Marley M. McBroom and four tracts which stood in the names of Marley M. McBroom and Melley J. McBroom, his wife.

For present purposes it may be said that the petition alleged the status of the various parties, and that plaintiffs and the defendant Clarence McBroom were children of Marley M. McBroom, who died on November 11, 1927, leaving a will which was offered for probate upon the petition of the widow, Melley J.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sill v. SillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Reville v. DubachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Larned v. LarnedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Weisner v. WeisnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Pirtle v. PirtleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patmore v. MacKecknieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Anderson v. RosebrookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API