Legal Opinion

Doll v. Chicago Title Insurance

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 6, 2007No. 06-2416-JWLPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

In this diversity action, plaintiffs James and Aimee Doll, on behalf of themselves and numerous potential class members, have brought contract and tort claims against defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company (Chicago Title). Plaintiffs’ claims are based on their allegation that Chicago Title, in acting as plaintiffs’ closing agent in a real estate refinancing, collected and retained an amount for recording fees in excess of the actual fees paid by Chicago Title for recording plaintiffs’ mortgage and release.

This matter presently comes…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  2. In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  3. Alpine Atlantic Asset Management AG v. ComstockDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  4. Jamieson v. Vatterott Educational Centers, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
  5. Gianino v. Alacer Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API