Legal Opinion
Osage Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 15, 2007No. 99-550 LPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
I. Background
A. Prior Proceedings
On September 21, 2006, the court issued an opinion regarding the allegations of plaintiff Osage Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma1 (Osage Nation or Osage Tribe) that the United States violated its fiduciary duties by failing to collect, deposit and invest all moneys due from Osage oil leases. Osage Tribe of Indians of Okla. v. United States, 72 Fed.Cl. 629, 631 (2006) (Osage II). The rulings in the Osage II opinion relate to the Tranche One2 trust fund mismanagement claims. Id. The Osage Nation identified two trust fund mismanagement claims…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Indians of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Short v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Peoria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. BlackfeatherSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Osage Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Jicarilla Apache Nation, Formerly Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Western Shoshone Identifiable Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019