Osage Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is an Amended Motion for Leave to Intervene and Brief in Support (Motion or Mot.), filed by seven members of plaintiff Osage Tribe (Proposed Intervenors). The responsive briefing consists of Plaintiff Osage Nation’s Opposition to Amended Motion to Intervene (plaintiffs Response or Pl.’s Resp.), Defendant’s Brief in Response to Proposed Intervenors’ Amended Motion to Intervene (defendant’s Response or Def.’s *165Resp.), and Proposed Intervenors’ Reply to Responses of the Osage Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma and the United States of America to Amended…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chippewa Cree Tribe of Rocky Boy's Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Fletcher v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2015
- Air Borealis Limited Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- FLETCHER v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.