Legal Opinion

Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Indians of Oklahoma v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 19, 1975No. Nos. 342-70, 343-70PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

These consolidated cases, before us on cross-motions for summary judgment as to liability, challenge the Government’s performance of its fiduciary duties as trustee of funds belonging to various Indian tribes. The suits are brought on behalf of a number of tribes either for themselves or as representatives of larger or aboriginal groups, but for the purpose of these motions the parties have agreed that two tribes for each suit will be considered representative “test plaintiffs.” No. 342-70 challenges the Government’s management of judgment funds in the Treasury belonging to plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Seminole Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
  5. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Buxton v. BuxtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Mitchell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Duncan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API