Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Commissioner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1954No. Docket No. 19, Calendar No. 46,098PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Presented is the question whether the general 6-year statute of limitations, CL 1948, § 609.13, as amended by PA 1951, No 21 (Stat Ann 1953 Cum Supp §27.605), applies to an inheritance *384tax claim of the State of Michigan under CL 1948, § 205.201 et seq. (Stat Ann § 7.561 et seq.).

CL 1948, § 609.28 (Stat Ann § 27.620), provides:

“The limitations herein before prescribed for the commencement of actions, shall apply to the same actions when brought in the name of the people of this State, or in the name of any officer or otherwise, for the benefit of the State, in the same manner as to actions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chambers v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Ward v. TinkhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. In Re Rackham's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Biddle v. Wendell ex rel. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Hurst v. CharronMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re MacDonald EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API