Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Rackham's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1951No. 21, Calendar No. 44,752PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

329 Mich. 493 (1951)

45 N.W.2d 273

In re RACKHAM'S ESTATE.

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 44,752.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided January 9, 1951.

Arthur W. Eckman, John R. Peterson, and Harry S. Toy, for petitioners.

Arthur J. Lacy, for Detroit Trust Company and administrators of Rackham estate.

Stephen J. Roth, Attorney General, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, T. Carl Holbrook, and Daniel J. O'Hara, Assistants Attorney General, for Department of Revenue.

BOYLES, J.

The sole question here is whether there is any State inheritance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eidman v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. In re the Appraisal under the Transfer Tax Act of the Estate of MasuryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Goodrich v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Welch's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Eberts v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Cress'estateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. PomeroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bishop Trust Company v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API