Legal Opinion

Tuffree v. Binford

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 11, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, Marshall District Court.— Hon. George W. Burnham, Judge. ' Action at law to recover a commission for the sale of real estate. Trial to a jury, verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

'Plaintiffs petition is in three counts. In the first he asked reasonable compensation for finding a purchaser for defendant’s property, at his (defendant’s) instance and request. In the second he asked judgment for an agreed compensation of two hundred dollars for finding a purchaser for the property — 'defendant having refused to complete the sale, because of his sale to another — and for failure to give plaintiff notice of the prior sale as he (defendant) had agreed to do. And in the third he asked compensation for services in finding a purchaser who was ready, willing, and able to take…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Iselin v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Ford v. R. Holt Easley & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. White & Hoskins v. BentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Boland v. KistleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. Payne Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Russell v. John Clemens & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Ransom-Ellis Co. v. EppelsheimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Bowe v. FrinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Donahoe v. GagenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API