Legal Opinion

State v. China

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 2002No. COA01-667PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

Benjamin Franklin China (“defendant”) appeals from judgment entered after a jury verdict found him guilty of second-degree burglary. We find no prejudicial error.

I. Facts

The evidence at trial tended to show that on the evening of 15 January 1994 at approximately 10:00 p.m. Jonetta Dixon (’’Jonetta”) and her husband Lacy Billings (“Lacy”) were visited by Lacy’s daughter Diane China (“Diane”) in their home. Diane is married to defendant. Diane borrowed $20.00 in cash from Lacy during their visit. Diane testified that she did not have a good relationship with Lacy.

Jonetta and Lacy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BerrymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. ClineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. In re T.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API