Legal Opinion

Culliton v. Chase

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1933No. 24491. En BancPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEALS, C.J., BLAKE, TOLMAN, and GERAGHTY, JJ., dissent. Alleging that the state income tax law (initiative No. 69, chap. 5, Laws of 1933, p. 49 [Rem. 1933 Sup., § 11200-1 etseq.]) was unconstitutional, respondents instituted two actions, which were consolidated for trial and appeal, against the members of the state tax commission to secure a permanent injunction restraining defendants from enforcing the act mentioned. The trial court was of the view that the challenged act offended against the uniformity requirement of the fourteenth amendment to the state constitution, and was therefore…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Diefendorf v. GalletIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Aberdeen Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Washington Public Ports Ass'n v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kelley v. KalodnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API