Legal Opinion

HUDSON CTY. NAT'L BK v. Provident Inst. for Savings

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 9, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

80 N.J. Super. 339 (1963)

193 A.2d 697

HUDSON COUNTY NATIONAL BANK, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFF,

v.

THE PROVIDENT INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS IN JERSEY CITY, A NEW JERSEY SAVINGS BANK, THE HOWARD SAVINGS INSTITUTION AND PLAINFIELD SAVINGS BANK, DEFENDANTS AND DEFENDANTS-INTERVENORS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided September 9, 1963.

Messrs. Milton, Keane & DeBona (Mr. John Milton, Jr. of counsel), attorneys for plaintiff.

Mr. Israel Spicer, attorney for amicus curiae New Jersey Bankers Association.

Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer (Mr. Frederick R. Becker of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Alexander v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Swede v. City of CliftonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Supermarkets Gen. Corp. v. SillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Pioneer State BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Savings Bank v. Bank CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Hudson Cty. Nat'l Bank v. Provident Inst. for Savings in Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. Terre Haute Savings Bank v. Indiana State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API