Legal Opinion

Trugman v. Reichenstein

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 2, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

50 N.J. Super. 377 (1958)

142 A.2d 614

JACK TRUGMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

HARRY REICHENSTEIN, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MICHAEL A. BONTEMPO, JOHN A. BRADY, JAMES T. CALLAGHAN, RAYMOND V. SANTORO, AND ESSEX COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 27, 1958.

Decided May 27, 1958.

Opinion filed June 2, 1958.

Before Judges STANTON, HALL and GAULKIN.

Mr. Samuel H. Nelson argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Joseph A. Ward argued the cause for the defendants-respondents (Mr. J. Ward, attorney for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Horwitz v. ReichensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Anthony v. ReaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Schwartz v. WachlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trugman v. ReichensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API