Prince Line, Ltd. v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
At Law. Separate actions by the Prince Line, Limited, and the American Hawaiian Steamship Company against the United States.
1Opinion of the Court
Prince Line, Limited.
CHATFIELD, District Judge.
The plaintiff has brought an action against the United States under the provisions of section 10,of the *536Act of August 10, 1917, 40 Stat. p. 276 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 3115⅛ii), for an amount claimed as just compensation for the possession and use of what is known as Pier 4 of the Bush Terminal in Brooklyn, from May 18, 1918, until May 1, 1919.
The President, under the statute, fixed this item of just compensation at the sum of $32,100.02. Seventy-five per cent, of the last amount, namely, $24,075.02, was paid by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States Ex Rel. Angarica v. BayardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. Chesapeake Ferry Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Anderson v. Chesapeake Ferry Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1947