Anderson v. Chesapeake Ferry Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1DissentSpratley, J.
Apprehensive of the results and misunderstanding which attend the conclusion of the majority, I feel bound to state my reasons for believing that a correct application of sound principles leads to a different result.
The question for our determination is not the measure of compensation which the State should receive for the use of its sovereign power in taking over the properties of the Ferry Company in the interest of the public, but what is the measure of compensation to be paid the Ferry Company for the temporary use of its properties by the State.
No evidence was taken in the case.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.