Legal Opinion

People v. Britt

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2004No. S115377PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*949Opinion

CHIN, J.

In California, certain sex offenders are required by statute to register with law enforcement authorities where they are residing. When they change residence within California, they must notify the local authorities in both their former and new residences. (Pen. Code, § 290, subds. (a)(1)(A) and (f)(1).)1 We must decide whether a person subject to these requirements who moves once from one county to another within California without notifying the authorities in either county, and hence who violates both subdivisions (a) and (f) of section 290, may be prosecuted and punished…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. People v. CorreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. KurtenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API