Leterman v. Charlottesville Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Charlottesville in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the Court
Buchanan, L,
delivered the opinion of the court.
In the view we take of this case the only question necessary to he considered is whether or not the trial court erred in striking out the special plea filed by Leterman (the plaintiff in error), who was defendant in that court.
One objection made to the plea is “That the plea sets forth the fact that the contract between the plaintiff and defendant was entered into by the defendant on behalf of a firm, composed of himself and one .Alfred Wollberg, which matter has been already formally and finally adjudicated by submitting that question to a jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Telegraph Co. v. GildersleveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Mangus v. McClellandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- National Bank v. NoltingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Columbia Accident Ass'n v. RockeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- American Manganese Co. v. Virginia Manganese Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Poole v. CamdenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Richmond College v. Scott-Nuckols Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Harris v. McKaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- A. S. White & Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Cell v. Barrow (In Re Barrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.