Richmond College v. Scott-Nuckols Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court, Part II, of the city of Richmond, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
*336Richmond College, hereinafter called the defendant, complains of a. verdict and judgment in favor of Scott-Nuckols Co., Incorporated, hereinafter called the contractor, for the balance claimed to be due for material and labor done in the construction of water and sewer lines laid under certain written contracts.
[1] There were three separate contracts. Contract No. 1 was dated March 6, 1914, and contract No. 3 September 15, 1914. There was another contract, generally referred to in the record as contract No. 2, which was dated July 13, 1914. One point of controversy arises out of the fact that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crouch v. . GutmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Norfolk & Western Railroad v. Mills & FairfaxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Bush v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
- Kistler v. Indianapolis & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Edwards v. HartshornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United Masonry Inc. v. Riggs National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Watson v. BrunnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Odessky v. Monterey Wine Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Chippenham Manor, Inc. v. DervishianSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- Ropp v. StevensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.