Legal Opinion
Alabama Water Service Co. v. City of Anniston
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 22, 1928No. 7 Div. 788PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
Section 6080 of the Code of 1923, new to said Code and being a codification of the Act of 1923, p. 250, says:
“Whenever the equity of a bill, complaint or petition has been tested and upheld by the Supreme Court on an appeal from any interlocutory order, judgment, or decree, no other appeal can be taken from any subsequent interlocutory order, judgment or decree; but the rulings of the trial court on any such interlocutory orders, judgments or decrees may be reviewed by the Supreme Court on appeal from the final judgment or decree.”
This provision was evidently intended to serve some purpose,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morton & Bliss v. New Orleans & Selma Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Shields v. HightowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- City of Anniston v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Alabama Water Co. v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas v. SkeggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Berman v. Wreck-A-Pair Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Alabama Water Co. v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Alexander v. LandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Alabama Water Co. v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.