Legal Opinion

Kafando v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1998No. 1084PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

We are asked to determine whether Section 1714 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1714, bars recovery of first party benefits to a “covered person” who is injured while a passenger in an insured motor vehicle where that claim*676ant, at the time of the accident, is the owner of an uninsured motor vehicle. The Honorable Michael T. Joyce granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of Paul Kafando, the claimant, and against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). We conclude that the deterrent purpose of Section 1714 is not advanced by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Kelly v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Allen v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Berger v. RinaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Swords v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Pro Golf Manufacturing, Inc. v. Tribune Review Newspaper Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Swords v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Andreyo v. Radle, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API