Lester v. United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Fund
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GOODWIN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Both parties argue that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because no genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the defendants, trustees of the United Mine Workers of America’s (UMWA) 1974 Pension Plan (Pension Plan), abused their discretion in denying the plaintiff, Robert Lester, disability benefits under the Pension Plan. The plaintiff suffered a cervical sprain resulting from mine accidents in 1986 and 1987. In 1997, the Social Security…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Bernstein v. CapitalCare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Gaynell Boyd v. Trustees of the United Mine Workers Health & Retirement FundsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Brogan v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ivory McCoy v. Michael Holland Joseph P. Brennan Marty D. Hudson B v. Hyler, Trustees of the 1974 Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004