Legal Opinion

Long v. Wright

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 2, 1921No. 9817PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of Cheyenne County, Hon. Arthur Cornforth, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Weight brought suit and obtained á decree against Long and McCrumb, defendants, and Simpson, intervenor, for specific performance of a contract between Long and Wright for the conveyance of land.

1. The decisive question was whether Wright’s contract, made with Long himself, the owner, on November 18, 1918, or Simpson’s contract, made November 12, 1918, with McCrumb, Long’s agent, was superior. Simpson, however, did not record his contract till after Wright got his and Wright appears to have been a bona fide purchaser for value with no actual notice of Simpson’s rights. That he had notice when…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Stein v. FrancisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
  3. Dixon v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
  4. Corney v. Kline Building & Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Plew v. Colorado Lumber ProductsColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Cornerstone Group XXII, L.L.C. v. Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Cornerstone Group XXII, L.L.C. v. Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API