Legal Opinion

Stein v. Francis

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 10, 1919PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On final hearing on bill for specific performance.

1Opinion of the Court

Leaming, V. C.

In this suit complainant, as vendee in a written contract 'of sale of real estate, seeks to enforce specific performance of the contract by his vendor. The wife of vendor has not signed the contract; complainant, accordingly, seeks no decree against her, bnt seeks a decree compelling the husband to convey the fee *206subject to his wife’s inchoate right of dower with either an abatement of the purchase price or indemnity against the future assertion of a claim of dower bjr the wife.

The contract is clear in its terms, is apparently fair and reasonable in its provisions and was agreed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bear v. FletcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Miller v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Crosby v. Georgia Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Parks v. MonroeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Payne v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Miller v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Pilone v. BlandaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. Thomas v. FlanaganNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. Hainz v. KurthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Johnson v. BatesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API