Legal Opinion
Cornerstone Group XXII, L.L.C. v. Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 10, 2006No. 05CA0279PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge WEBB.
In this breach of contract action concerning condemnation and development of private property, plaintiff, Cornerstone Group XXII, L.L.C., appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing its specific performance claim against defendant, Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority (the Authority). The Authority cross-appeals the trial court’s preliminary injunction requiring it to preserve certain assets to satisfy a potential damage award in favor of Cornerstone. We affirm the preliminary injunction, reverse the dismissal, and remand for further proceedings.
I. Factual Background
In…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Contributors to the Pennsylvania Hospital v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Rathke v. MacFarlaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- City of Golden v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sanger v. DennisColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority v. Cornerstone Group XXII, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Planned Pethood Plus, Inc. v. KeyCorp, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- College Park Pentecostal Holiness Church v. General Steel Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Cornerstone Group XXII, L.L.C. v. Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 2006