Legal Opinion

Clarence Fry v. Tim Shoop

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 3, 2025No. 23-3270PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0004p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CLARENCE FRY, ┐ Petitioner-Appellant, │ │ > No. 23-3270 v. │ │ │ TIMOTHY SHOOP, Warden, │ Respondent-Appellee. │ ┘ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland. No. 1:19-cv-02307—Pamela A. Barker, District Judge. Argued: December 10, 2024 Decided and Filed: January 3, 2025 Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; SILER and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges. _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Adam D. Vincent, OFFICE OF THE OHIO…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christopher Sanchez, Sr. v. Jamie CorriganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  2. Phillip Jones v. Tim ShoopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
  3. Roger Stein v. James SchiebnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API