Legal Opinion

Martin v. Lehmann

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1962No. 825PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY F. TURNER, Judge pro tem.

Alleging that as a result of a permanent wave given by defendant’s operator her hair was ruined and her scalp was burned, causing her to become bald, plaintiff prayed for damages against defendant in the sum of $800, $200 for physical pain and suffering, and $600 for “ruination and loss of head of hair.” Defendant denied that damage to plaintiff’s hair was due to any negligence on his part, averring that only the best chemicals were used in giving the permanent wave and alleging that whatever damage plaintiff suffered was due to the fact that she, over the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lanza v. MetcalfLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Horton v. Seligman and Latz, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Austin v. JacksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Tarbox v. EasonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Elder v. Westside Transit Lines, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API