Legal Opinion

Lanza v. Metcalf

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1946No. 6903PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Marcel Beauty Shoppe, Incorporated, one of the defendants herein, owns and operates a beauty salon and is engaged in the practice of cosmetic therapy for pay, in the City of Shreveport, Louisiana. In connection with the salon this defendant also conducts what is called the Majestic Beauty School, wherein enrolled students are taught and trained in the art of cosmetic therapy or beauty culture. Mrs. Marguerite G. Metcalf, the other defendant, is the president of and a stockholder in the corporation.

Plaintiff entered defendant's place of business to procure and was given a permanent hair…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thalheim v. SuhrenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. DeBellevue v. CouvillionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Boutte Courrege v. DerokayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Barrois v. NotoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Scott v. JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Bush v. BookterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Smith v. KennedyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Howard v. Insurance Company of North AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API