Legal Opinion
Tarbox v. Eason
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1965No. 10457PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AYRES, Judge.
This action ex delicto was brought by plaintiff against the defendant, owner and operator of a beauty salon, to recover damages allegedly sustained because of injury and damage to her hair from the *918application of chemicals in giving her permanent waves on either or both of two occasions- — -the first on July 31, 1964, and the second about three weeks later. Plaintiff alleges that her hair, because of the negligence of defendant and her employee in giving her the permanents, became dry, brittle, and unmanageable, and that patches of it fell out, which necessitated that she buy and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Plunkett v. United Electric ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Morales v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Jones v. Shell Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Gerald v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moak v. Link-Belt CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Fruge v. TrahanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. LavergneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Ardoin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Valentine v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967