Legal Opinion

United States v. Von Neumann

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 14, 1986No. 84-1144PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

We must decide in this case whether a 36-day delay by the United States Customs Service in responding to a remission petition filed by respondent in response to the seizure of his car by customs agents deprived respondent of property without due process of law.

I

Title 19 U. S. C. § 14971 provides that any article not declared upon entry into the United States which by law *244must be declared is subject to forfeiture or to a penalty equaling the value of the article. After seizure of an article by the United States Customs Service, a claimant to it has essentially two options. He may pursue an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Slocum v. MayberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  5. United States v. Von NeumannSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Alvarez v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Gerardo Serrano v. U.S. Customs and BorderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  5. Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API