Legal Opinion
Casey v. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 14, 1994No. Nos. 93-1503, 93-1504PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
The Supreme Court, in deciding this case on appeal, laid down a specific mandate: “The judgment in No. 91-902 is affirmed. The judgment in No. 91-744 is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion, including consideration of the question of severability.” Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, — U.S. -,-, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 2833, 120 L.Ed.2d 674 (1992) (joint opinion of O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter, JJ.) (“Casey III”).1 We understood that opinion to resolve all questions in this…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Karlin v. FoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- American Chemical Society v. Leadscope, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. CollierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State ex rel. Heck v. KesslerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Continental Airlines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.