Legal Opinion

Nistad v. Winton Lumber Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1938No. 6591PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C. J.

This is a proceeding by Regina Nistad to recover compensation for the death of her husband.

Respondent Winton Lumber Company is now, and for a number of years has been, engaged in the operation of a sawmill at Gibbs, in Kootenai county, Idaho, and was, and is, insured by respondent Workmen’s Compensation Exchange under the provisions of our workmen’s compensation statute.

For several years Axel Nistad was employed as a regular piler but for about a year prior to June 1, 1937, he was usually employed in the capacity of a “ spare piler. ’ ’ When Nistad came home from work on the evening of May 3,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Feuling v. Farmers' Co-Operative Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Evans v. CavanaghIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Butler v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kiger v. Idaho CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Stroscheim v. ShayIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Cain v. C. C. Anderson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Golay v. StoddardIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hamlin v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API