Legal Opinion

Hamlin v. University of Idaho

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1940No. 6746PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Subsequent to the argument of this cause on its merits the court requested briefs upon questions suggested by reason of the fact that the record disclosed that two members of the Industrial Accident Board took testimony of the witnesses in the state of Washington upon stipulation of the parties.

The broad question involves only the power, right or jurisdiction of the Industrial Accident Board to take evidence without the state of Idaho.

After an examination of this matter and the briefs that have been submitted we are convinced that the taking of the testimony by the board in Spokane on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. RuddyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Taylor v. HulettIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Evans v. CavanaghIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. MacDonald v. OganIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Utah Ass'n of Credit Men v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Cain v. C. C. Anderson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Thom v. CallahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API