Legal Opinion

People's Savings Bank v. Campau

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Waite, J. Assumpsit by the People’s Savings Bank against Daniel J. Campau and others upon a bond. Prom a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff commenced suit against defendants by summons in a plea of trespass on the case upon promises. It set up in its declaration a bond reading as follows:

“Know all men by these presents, that we, Ered T. Moran, E. E. Palms, Daniel J. Campau, George M. Vail, all of the city of Detroit, and W. L. Churchill, of Alpena, Michigan, are held and firmly bound unto the People’s Savings Bank, a body corporate under the laws of the State of Michigan, in the sum of thirty -thousand dollars ($30,000), lawful money of the United States, to be paid the said People’s Savings Bank, its successors or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. BushNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  2. Lyon v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. Day v. Toledo, Canada Southern & Detroit Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. White Sewing Machine Co. v. DakinMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Fraser v. LittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County of Oakland v. Central West Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
  3. Campau v. Detroit Driving ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API