Day v. Toledo, Canada Southern & Detroit Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. Trespass on the case. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Day sued the railway company for injuries received in having his fingers' caught in coupling cars on a train of which he was brakeman. The train was a freight train, and the car which he claims caused the damage had been brought a few miles from Grosse Isle to Wyandotte, and the plaintiff was unable to say that he had not himself originally attached it to the train. At Wyandotte a car was to be detached, and then the car in question, which was loaded with lumber, was ordered by the conductor to be reeoupled to another car-on the train. The lumber is said, by plaintiff to have projected…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Smith v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Hoth v. PetersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Lothrop v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Norfolk & Western R. R. v. CottrellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.