Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Little

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1865PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Saginaw Circuit.- The case was an action of debt on a replevin bond; was tried by the Circuit Judge; without a jury, and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs, (defendants in error.)

1Opinion of the Court

Martin Ch. J.:

This action is for the recovery of the penalty of a bond executed by Fraser and Raymond, in the penalty of $800, conditioned that one Robertson should prosecute-to effect an action of replevin then commenced by him against the defendants in error — Little, Hess and BoutelL It appears that Robertson was defeated in his action, and judgment rendered against him for the value of the prop-, erty replevied by him — viz., for $1,753 T^. I do not learn from the bill of exceptions that any execution was. issued upon such judgment, and returned as unsatisfied wholly or in part, nor that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brainard v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Clark v. BushNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  3. Pullen v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ellyson v. LordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Frink v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Mullen v. MorrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. County of Oakland v. Central West Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. People v. HanawMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API