Disciplinary Proceedings Against Mandelman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. Attorney Michael D. Mandel-man has appealed that portion of a referee's report finding that the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) proved by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence that Attorney Mandelman engaged in misconduct with respect to his representation of five clients. The OLR has cross-appealed the referee's findings and conclusion with respect to one of the counts as to which the referee found the OLR had not met its burden of proof.
¶ 2. We conclude that all of the referee’s findings of fact, including those challenged by the OLR, are supported by satisfactory and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against ReitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by18 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NussbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mandelman (In Re Mandelman)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.