Legal Opinion

East Coast Fertilizer Co. v. Hardee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is the validity of the order of Judge Parker denying plaintiff’s motion for jury trial upon an issue in the cause, wbicb, by the judgment of Judge Frizzelle, bad been ordered retained on the civil issue docket for tbat purpose.

While the reference ordered by Frizzelle, J., in the first instance, was by consent, it may be open to debate whether the order to the referee to “bear the testimony, render an accounting, and report bis findings” contemplated the consideration and decision by him of the issue of fraudulent conversion raised by the pleadings.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Roulhac v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Dockery v. Fairbanks-Morse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. May v. Stimson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carr v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Neighbors v. NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Topping v. North Carolina State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Moore v. W O O W, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. East Coast Fertilizer Co. v. HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API