Legal Opinion
Wright v. Stansberry
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 4, 2011No. Civil Action 10-0594 (RMU)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the petition of Chester Wright (“the petitioner”) for a writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons discussed below, the court denies the petition.
II. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In January 1997, the petitioner was convicted of various offenses, including first degree murder while armed, in the Superi- or Court of the District of Columbia. Pet. at 2; Mem. in Supp. of Pet. for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petr’s Mem.”) at 1, 6. The petitioner appealed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- David Isaiah Garris v. Charles S. Lindsay, Administrator, Maximum Security FacilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Williams v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Gary E. Byrd v. John S. Henderson and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wright v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Payne v. StansberryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Greenwood v. BolsterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Payne v. StansberryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Pleasant v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.