Legal Opinion

United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1918No. 3165PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; EMward H. Cushman, Judge. Suit in equity by the United States against the Great Northern Railway Company. Decree for defendant, and the United States appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WORVERTON, District Judge.

This is a suit to cancel a patent issued to the Great Northern Railway Company by the United States for the land 'in controversy, on the ground of alleged inadvertence and mistake of the Rand Department in issuing the same. The land in question was selected in lieu of land which the St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Company relinquished to the United States in pursuance of the Act of Congress of August 5, 1892, c. 382, 27 Stat. 390. The defendant is the successor in interest of the St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Company. The lands subject to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Sjoli v. DreschelSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Osborn v. FroysethSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Struett v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
  3. Reed v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API