Sjoli v. Dreschel
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
This case was tried upon a stipulation of facts. It involves the title to the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section five, township one hundred and thirty-three north, of range forty-two, west of the fifth principal meridian, Minnesota,. which is situated opposite to and coterminous with a part of the fine of the Northern Pacific Railroad as definitely located on the- twenty-first day of November, 1871, and is within the first indemnity limits of the grant of public lands made by the act of Congress of July 2, 1864, in aid of the construction by the Northern Pacific Railroad…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Kansas Pacific Railroad v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Grinnell v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Svor v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Osborn v. FroysethSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Johnson v. County of LincolnMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Morrow v. Warner Valley Stock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.